丁晓东|中国人民大学法学院教授、未来法治研究院副院长

注：

本文献清单主要关注英文论文类文献，不包括各类英文指南、案例。鉴于收集能力与关注偏好，文献的收集与筛选难免有疏漏和侧重，核心文献、重点文献、相关理论文献也未必符合不同研究者看法，更不代表不同文献的重要程度。本文献清单主要为了课程阅读所用，同时加深学界对个人信息保护制度的理解，促进学术共同体的形成。本文献清单欢迎补充、转载。转载请注明出处，保证全文完整性。

告知同意

NO.1

核心文献

  • Daniel J. Solove,“Introduction: Privacy Self-Management and the Consent Dilemma”, 126 HARV. L. Rev.，2013

  • Elettra Bietti, Consent as a Free Pass: Platform Power and the Limits of the Informational Turn, 40 Pace L. Rev. 307 (2020)

  • Fred H. Cate & Viktor Mayer-Schonberger, Notice and Consent in a World of Big Data, 3 INT’L DATA PRIVACY LAW 67 (2013)

  • Jack M. Balkin, Information Fiduciaries and the First Amendment, 49 U.C. DAVIS L. REV. 1185 (2016)

  • Neil Richard & Woody Hartzog, The Pathologies of Digital Consent, 96 Washington University Law Review 1461 (2019)

  • Omri Ben-Shahar and Carl E. Schneider,“The Failure of Mandated Disclosure,” U.P A . L. R EV159, 2011

  • Peter P. Swire,“The Surprising Virtues of the New Financial Privacy Law”, Minn. L. Rev. 86, 2002

告知同意

NO.2

重点文献

  • Alessandro Acquisti and Jens Grossklags et al.,“What Can Behavioral Economics Teach Us About Privacy?” in Acquisti A., Vimercati S. C., Gritzalis S., Lambrinoudakis C.ed., Digital Privacy: Theory, Technologies and Practices, Auerbach Publications(Taylor and Francis Group), 2007

  • Alessandro Acquisti, Nudging Privacy, 7 IEEE SECURITY & PRIVACY 82 (2009)

  • Alessandro Acquistietal., What Is Privacy Worth?,42J.LEGALSTUD. 249, 264 (2013)

  • Allyson W. Haynes, Online Privacy Policies: Contracting Away Control over Personal Information?, 111 PENN ST. L. REV. 587, 594 (2007)

  • Ari Ezra Waldman, CognitiveBiases, Dark Patterns,and the "PrivacyParadox",31 CUR- RENT OP. PSYCH. 105, 105 (2020)

  • Bettina Berendt, Oliver Gunther & Sarah Spiekermann, Privacy in E-Commerce: Stated Preferencesvs. Actual Behavior, COMMC"NS ACM, Apr. 2005

  • Christoph Bosch, et al, Tales from the Dark Side: Privacy Dark Strategies and Privacy Dark Patterns. 4 Proc. Priv. Enh. Technol. 237–254(2016)

  • Daniel Susser, Notice After Notice-and-Consent: Why Privacy Disclosures Are Valuable Even If Consent Frameworks Aren’t, 9 J. INFO. POL. (2019)

  • Daniel J. Solove, The Myth of the Privacy Paradox, 89 GEO. Wash. L. REV. 1 (2021)

  • Dennis D. Hirsch, From Individual Control to Social Protection: New Paradigms for Privacy Law in the Age of Predictive Analytics, MAR. L. REV. (2019)

  • Elizabeth Edenberg & Meg Leta-Jones, Analyzing the Legal Roots and Moral Core of Digital Consent, NEW MEDIA & SOC’Y 1 (2019)

  • Erika J. Nash, Notice and Consent: A Healthy Balance Between Privacy and Innovation for Wearables, 33 BYU J. PUB. L. 197 (2018)

  • Gregory Klass, Empiricism and Privacy Policies in the Restatement of Consumer Contract Law, 36 Yale J. on Reg. 45-115 (2019)

  • Hans Degryse and Jan Bouckaert, Opt in Versus Opt Out: A Free-Entry Analysis of Privacy Policies (September 2006)

  • Jeff Sovern, Opting in, Opting out, or No Options at All: The Fight for Control of Personal Information, 74 WASH. L. REV. 1033 (1999)

  • Joel R. Reidenberg,“Resolving Conflicting International Data Privacy Rules in Cyberspace”, STAN. L. REV. 52, 2000

  • Julie E. Cohen, Turning Privacy Inside Out, 20 THEORETICAL INQUIRIES IN L. (2019)

  • Lauren H. Scholz, Privacy as Quasi-Property, 101 IOWA L. REV. 1113 (2016)

  • Lior Strahilevitz & Mathew Kugler, Is Privacy Policy Language Irrelevant to Consumers? 45 J. Legal Stud. S69–S95(2016)

  • Lorrie Faith Cranor,“Necessary But Not Sufficient: Standardized Mechanisms for Privacy Notice and Choice”, Journal on Telecommunications and High Technology Law, Vol.10(2012)

  • Marc Rotenberg, Fair Information Practices and the Architecture of Privacy (What Larry Doesn’t Get), 2001 STAN. TECH. L. REV. 1, 44 (2001)

  • Michael Froomkin, Big Data: Destroyer of Informed Consent, Yale Journal of Health Policy, Law, and Ethics(2019)

  • Neil Richard & Woody Hartzog, A Relational Turn for Data Protection? 4 European Data Protection Law Review 1 (2020)

  • Omri Ben-Shahar and Adam Chilton. "Simplification of privacy disclosures: An experimental test." The Journal of Legal Studies 45.2016

  • Omri Ben-Shahar,“Contracting Over Privacy: Introduction”, Journal of Legal Studies43, 2016.

  • Paul M. Schwartz,“Property, Privacy, and Personal Data”, Harvard Law Review117, 2004

  • Paul Ohm, Branding Privacy, Minnesota Law Review 97 (2013)

  • Paula J. Bruening & Mary J. Culnan.“Through a Glass Darkly: From Privacy Notices to Effective Transparency.” North Carolina Journal of Law and Technology 17, no. 4 (2016)

  • Robert H. Sloan & Richard Warner,“Beyond Notice and Choice: Privacy, Norms, and Consent”, Suffolk University Journal of High Technology Law, Vol.14(2014)

  • Ryan Calo, Digital Market Manipulation. 82 Geo. Wash. L. Rev. 995–1051(2014)

  • Solon Barocas & Helen Nissenbaum, On Notice: The Trouble with Notice and Consent, PROCEEDINGS OF THE ENGAGING DATA FORUM: THE FIRST INT’L FORUM ON THE APP. AND MGMT. OF PERS. ELEC. INFO. (2009)

  • Solon Barocas and Helen Nissenbaum,“Big Data’s End Run around Anonymity and Consent”, in Julia Lane (et. al.) (eds.), Privacy, Big Data, and the Public Good: Frameworks for Engagement , London: Cambridge University Press, 2014, pp.44-75

  • Susan Athey, Christian Catalini & Catherine Tucker, The DigitalPrivacy Paradox: Small Money, Small Costs, Small Talk 18 (MIT Sloan Research Paper No. 5196-17; Stanford Univ. Graduate Sch. of Bus. Research Paper No. 17-14, 2018)

  • Tal Zarsky, Privacy and Manipulation in the Digital Age, 20.1 THEORETICAL INQUIRIES L. 157 (2019)

  • William McGeveran, Friending the Privacy Regulators. 58 Ariz. L. Rev. 959–1025(2016)

  • Woodrow Hartzog and Neil Richards,“Privacy’s Constitutional Moment and the Limits of Data Protection”, Boston College Loston College Law Review 61, 2020

  • Woody Hartzog & Neil Richard, The Surprising Virtues of Data Loyalty 71 Emory Law Journal 985 (2022)

告知同意

NO.3

相关理论文献

  • Bradley Kar & Radin Margaret Radin, Pseudo-Contract and Shared Meaning Analysis. 132 Harv. L. Rev. 1135–1219

  • Daniel J. Solove and Woodrow Hartzog,“The FTC and the New Common Law of Privacy”, COLUM. L. REV. 114, 2014

  • Daniel J. Solove,“Privacy and Power: Computer Databases and Metaphors for Information Privacy”, Stan. L. Rev.53, 2001

  • Daniel Susser et al., Online Manipulation: Hidden Influences in a Digital World, 3 GEO. L. TECH. REV. (2019)

  • Danielle Kie Hart,“Contract Formation and the Entrenchment of Power”, LOY. U. CHI. L.J. 41, 2009

  • Dennis D. Hirsch, The Law and Policy of Online Privacy: Regulation Self-Regulation, or Co-Regulation?, Seattle University Law Review, Vol.34:439, p.458–459 (2011)

  • Henry Hansmann and Reinier Kraakman,“Property, Contract, and Verification: The Numerus Clausus Problem and the Divisibility of Rights”, Harvard Law School31, 2002

  • Howard Latin,“‘Good’Warnings, Bad Products, and Cognitive Limitations”, UCLA L. Rev. 41, 1994

  • Ian Ayres and Alan Schwartz,“The No Reading Problem in Consumer Contract Law”, Stanford Law Review 66, 2014

  • Jessica Litman,“Information Privacy / Information Property”, Stan. L. Rev.52, 2000

  • Karen Yeung, Hypernudge: Big Data as a Mode of Regulation by Design, 20 INFO. COMM. & SOC’Y 118 (2017)

  • Lauren Henry Scholz, Fiduciary Boilerplate: Locating Fiduciary Relationships in Information Age Consumer Transactions, 46 J. CORP. L. 143, 144–45 (2020)

  • Mark A. Lemley,“Terms of Use”, MINN. L. REV. 91, 2006

  • Onora O’Neill,“Some Limits of Informed Consent”, Journal of Medical Ethics, Vol.29(2003)

  • Richard H. Thaler& Cass Sunstein, Nudge: Improving Decisions about Health, Wealth, and Happiness. New York: Penguin Books, 2009

  • THE ETHICS OF CONSENT: THEORY AND PRACTICE (Franklin Miller & Alan Werthmeier, eds., 2009

推荐阅读：

Sloan & Warner教授：个人信息保护应超越“告知-同意”

Lorrie Cranor：必要但不充分：隐私“通知-选择”框架的标准化机制

Ryan Calo：隐私保护中的告知-同意失效了吗——“直观”通知的兴起

编辑：黄一宸

声明：本文来自网络西东，版权归作者所有。文章内容仅代表作者独立观点，不代表安全内参立场，转载目的在于传递更多信息。如有侵权，请联系 anquanneican@163.com。